Case details
Class: Company misclassified employees’ employment status
SUMMARY
$475000
Amount
Settlement
Result type
Not present
Ruling
KEYWORDS
FACTS
Since Dec. 23, 2005, plaintiff Michael Gilhuly, an employee at KMART Corp., was allegedly misclassified as a manager, causing him to not earn overtime wages or receive proper break periods. Gilhuly, acting individually and on behalf of those similarly situated, brought a class action against KMART Corp. for violations of the Labor Code and Unfair Competition Act. The case was originally in Alameda Superior Court, but later was removed to federal court. The class of over 100 members claimed that they were misclassified as exempt sales coaches, operations managers and/or merchandise managers by KMART since Dec. 23, 2005. As a result, the class claimed that KMART failed to provide them with overtime and regular wages, and proper meal and rest periods. They also claimed that KMART failed to pay wages upon termination and that the company’s actions constituted unfair business practices under the Unfair Competition Act. KMART contended that it properly designated Gilhuly and the class as exempt and fully complied with the law at all times., The class sought recovery for damages for unpaid overtime wages and interest. They also sought recovery for one hour of pay at each employee’s regular rate for each work day that a meal period was not provided, and one hour of pay at each employee’s regular rate for each work day that a rest period was not provided. In addition, they sought various penalties, and recovery of attorney fees and costs.
COURT
United States District Court, Northern District, Oakland, CA
Similar Cases
Negligent tire repair caused serious rollover crash: family
AMOUNT:
$375,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Steep, winding road caused multiple truck crashes: plaintiffs
AMOUNT:
$32,500,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Dangerous highway caused fatal multiple vehicle crash: suit
AMOUNT:
$18,681,052
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Applicant claimed future care needed after fall from roof
AMOUNT:
$3,500,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Roofer claimed he needs future care after fall from roof
AMOUNT:
$6,000,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
INJURIES:
- anxiety
- brain
- brain damage
- brain injury
- cognition
- depression
- epidural
- extradural hematoma
- face
- facial bone
- fracture
- head
- headaches
- hearing
- impairment
- insomnia
- loss of
- mental
- nose
- psychological
- scapula
- sensory
- shoulder
- skull
- speech
- subdural hematoma
- tinnitus
- traumatic brain injury
- vision
- Show More
- Show Less
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Plaintiff: Improperly trained delivery personnel caused injuries
AMOUNT:
$4,875,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury