Case details
Company failed to provide uninterrupted meal breaks: suit
SUMMARY
$6001599
Amount
Verdict-Plaintiff
Result type
Not present
Ruling
KEYWORDS
FACTS
From June 8, 2013 to Aug. 21, 2018, plaintiffs Chelsea Hamilton and Alyssa Hernandez, employees at a Wal-Mart fulfillment center in Chino, were allegedly not provided proper meal breaks or proper overtime compensation. The claimed other, similarly-situated employees were also affected by the company’s actions. Hamilton and Hernandez, acting individually and as representatives of a class of 4,840 persons at a Wal-Mart fulfillment center in Chino, sued their employers, Wal-Mart Stores Inc. and Wal-Mart Associates Inc. Hamilton and Hernandez alleged that the defendants failed to provide proper meal periods and/or overtime compensation to its employees, in violation of the California Labor Code. Plaintiffs’ counsel contended that Wal-Mart failed to provide lawful meal periods by requiring employees to undergo an off-the-clock security check before exiting the premises, which would prevent employees from leaving the facility for their meal breaks. Counsel also contended that the company improperly implemented an alternative workweek schedule, resulting in a failure to pay overtime compensation, as required by California law, for hours worked between eight and 10 hours a day. Wal-mart denied the plaintiffs’ allegations., Hamilton and Hernandez, acting individually and on behalf of the class of 4,840 persons, sought recovery of the unpaid wages owed to them.
COURT
United States District Court, Central District, Los Angeles, CA
Similar Cases
Negligent tire repair caused serious rollover crash: family
AMOUNT:
$375,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Steep, winding road caused multiple truck crashes: plaintiffs
AMOUNT:
$32,500,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Dangerous highway caused fatal multiple vehicle crash: suit
AMOUNT:
$18,681,052
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Applicant claimed future care needed after fall from roof
AMOUNT:
$3,500,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Roofer claimed he needs future care after fall from roof
AMOUNT:
$6,000,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
INJURIES:
- anxiety
- brain
- brain damage
- brain injury
- cognition
- depression
- epidural
- extradural hematoma
- face
- facial bone
- fracture
- head
- headaches
- hearing
- impairment
- insomnia
- loss of
- mental
- nose
- psychological
- scapula
- sensory
- shoulder
- skull
- speech
- subdural hematoma
- tinnitus
- traumatic brain injury
- vision
- Show More
- Show Less
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Plaintiff: Improperly trained delivery personnel caused injuries
AMOUNT:
$4,875,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury