Case details
Cook claimed company didn’t pay him for overtime
SUMMARY
$60245.72
Amount
Decision-Plaintiff
Result type
Not present
Ruling
KEYWORDS
FACTS
From 2007 to November 2010, plaintiff Carlos Martinez, a tortilla cook at Tortilleria Santacruz Mexican Food Products’ Escondido factory, did not receive wages for overtime. He also claimed that he did not receive rest and meal period breaks during this time. Martinez sued Tortilleria Santacruz Mexican Food Products’ operator, Tortilleria Santacruz Enterprises Inc., and the owner of the company, Juan Santacruz. He alleged that the defendants failed to pay him appropriate wages for the hours worked and failed to provide him with appropriate break periods in violation of the California Labor Code and Fair Labor Standards Act. The matter proceeded to a bench trial. Martinez claimed that the defendants failed to pay him for overtime, or provide him with appropriate rest and meal period breaks. He also claimed that the defendants failed to provide him with accurate itemized wage statements. Santacruz claimed that Martinez was not authorized to work overtime and that the company did not know the plaintiff was working overtime. Thus, defense counsel argued that because Martinez was not authorized to work overtime, his wage statements were accurate., Martinez sought recovery of $60,245.72 in total damages for his unpaid overtime, rest and meal time period breaks, and civil penalties. Defense counsel argued that Martinez was not authorized to work overtime and was owed zero damages for unpaid wages. Counsel further argued that Martinez was given proper meal and rest period breaks.
COURT
Superior Court of San Diego County, San Diego, CA
Similar Cases
Negligent tire repair caused serious rollover crash: family
AMOUNT:
$375,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Steep, winding road caused multiple truck crashes: plaintiffs
AMOUNT:
$32,500,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Dangerous highway caused fatal multiple vehicle crash: suit
AMOUNT:
$18,681,052
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Applicant claimed future care needed after fall from roof
AMOUNT:
$3,500,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Roofer claimed he needs future care after fall from roof
AMOUNT:
$6,000,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
INJURIES:
- anxiety
- brain
- brain damage
- brain injury
- cognition
- depression
- epidural
- extradural hematoma
- face
- facial bone
- fracture
- head
- headaches
- hearing
- impairment
- insomnia
- loss of
- mental
- nose
- psychological
- scapula
- sensory
- shoulder
- skull
- speech
- subdural hematoma
- tinnitus
- traumatic brain injury
- vision
- Show More
- Show Less
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Plaintiff: Improperly trained delivery personnel caused injuries
AMOUNT:
$4,875,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury