Case details
Defense claimed employee was fired for poor performance
SUMMARY
$0
Amount
Verdict-Defendant
Result type
Not present
Ruling
KEYWORDS
emotional distress, mental, psychological
FACTS
In 2013, plaintiff Kirk Broten, a senior executive of merchandising, was terminated from his position with a Target store in San Diego. Broten claimed he was terminated because he disclosed to regional directors and to human resources personnel alleged violations of California law on the part of his supervisors. Broten sued his employer, Target Corp.; his direct supervisor, the store manager, Merrilee Ekstrom; and the district manager, Lee Kaufmann. Broten alleged that the defendants’ actions constituted retaliation and wrongful termination in violation of public policy and in the Fair Employment and Housing Act. Ekstrom and Kaufman were ultimately let out of the case on motions for summary judgment. Broten was employed as a senior executive of merchandising responsible for the sales floor and dayside backroom operations of a Target store in San Diego. He testified that while he was working, he witnessed several racist and discriminatory actions on the part of Target management, and subsequently complained about the actions. However, Broten contended that Target Corp. fired him in retaliation for making the complaints. Target’s counsel contended that Broten started making exaggerated complaints about innocent interactions among the managers after he was told that he was going on a corrective action. Thus, counsel argued that Broten began making the exaggerated complaints in an effort to save himself from being placed on corrective action. Broten’s supervisors testified that Broten was ultimately terminated for continued poor performance., Broten, who was employed by Target Corp. since 2005, sought recovery of over $3 million for his past lost wages, future lost wages, emotional distress, and punitive damages. Defense counsel contended that Broten did not obtain employment after he was terminated and, instead, used his time to develop and launch a private business, which was not profitable. Thus, defense counsel argued that Broten failed to adequately mitigate his damages and that Broten’s damages were extremely limited.
COURT
Superior Court of San Diego County, San Diego, CA
Similar Cases
Negligent tire repair caused serious rollover crash: family
AMOUNT:
$375,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Steep, winding road caused multiple truck crashes: plaintiffs
AMOUNT:
$32,500,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Dangerous highway caused fatal multiple vehicle crash: suit
AMOUNT:
$18,681,052
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Applicant claimed future care needed after fall from roof
AMOUNT:
$3,500,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Roofer claimed he needs future care after fall from roof
AMOUNT:
$6,000,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
INJURIES:
- anxiety
- brain
- brain damage
- brain injury
- cognition
- depression
- epidural
- extradural hematoma
- face
- facial bone
- fracture
- head
- headaches
- hearing
- impairment
- insomnia
- loss of
- mental
- nose
- psychological
- scapula
- sensory
- shoulder
- skull
- speech
- subdural hematoma
- tinnitus
- traumatic brain injury
- vision
- Show More
- Show Less
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Plaintiff: Improperly trained delivery personnel caused injuries
AMOUNT:
$4,875,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury