Case details
Defense claimed plaintiff’s dog not on leash prior to encounter
SUMMARY
$0
Amount
Verdict-Defendant
Result type
Not present
Ruling
KEYWORDS
damage, decreased range of motion, loss, muscle
FACTS
In 2016, plaintiff Farahnaz Shaham, a dental hygienist in her 30s, was leaving her back yard in Beverly Hills when her dog walked out behind her without a leash. At the same time, a dog owned by Judith Douglas got loose from a leash held by Douglas’ housekeeper and approached Shaham and her dog. Shaham became frightened as the dogs circled her. As a result, she jumped and sustained to her right calf. Shaham sued Douglas. Shaham alleged that Douglas was strictly liable for her dog’s actions and was negligent for failing to control her dog. Defense counsel contended that Shaham was contributorily at fault for having her own dog loose, with no leash, in violation of the Beverly Hills Municipal Code., Shaham tore the gastrocnemius tendon in her right calf as a result of jumping. She was immediately taken to a hospital, where she was treated and released. Shaham claimed that after the incident, she was no longer able to operate the dental machinery at her job as well as she used to, as she had trouble pushing down on the foot pedals due to her leg injury. The plaintiff’s expert neurologist opined that Shaham will eventually require surgery to repair the tendon. Shaham sought recovery for her past and future medical costs, past and future loss of earnings, and past and future pain and suffering. The defense’s expert orthopedic surgeon opined that Shaham’s tendon tear would heal on its own over time and that no future surgery would be required.
COURT
Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Torrance, CA
Similar Cases
Negligent tire repair caused serious rollover crash: family
AMOUNT:
$375,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Steep, winding road caused multiple truck crashes: plaintiffs
AMOUNT:
$32,500,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Dangerous highway caused fatal multiple vehicle crash: suit
AMOUNT:
$18,681,052
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Applicant claimed future care needed after fall from roof
AMOUNT:
$3,500,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Roofer claimed he needs future care after fall from roof
AMOUNT:
$6,000,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
INJURIES:
- anxiety
- brain
- brain damage
- brain injury
- cognition
- depression
- epidural
- extradural hematoma
- face
- facial bone
- fracture
- head
- headaches
- hearing
- impairment
- insomnia
- loss of
- mental
- nose
- psychological
- scapula
- sensory
- shoulder
- skull
- speech
- subdural hematoma
- tinnitus
- traumatic brain injury
- vision
- Show More
- Show Less
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Plaintiff: Improperly trained delivery personnel caused injuries
AMOUNT:
$4,875,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury