Case details
EEOC claimed company wrongfully fired disabled workers
SUMMARY
$800000
Amount
Settlement
Result type
Not present
Ruling
KEYWORDS
FACTS
In 2011, claimants consisting of eight employees of Sensient Natural Ingredients LLC, of Turlock, had their employments terminated. They claimed they were fired for taking medical leave, or for their actual or perceived disabilities. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission sued Sensient Natural Ingredients LLC (formally known as Sensient Dehydrated Flavors Co. and Sensient Dehydrated Flavors LLC). The EEOC alleged that Sensient violated the Americans with Disabilities Act, as amended. The EEOC claimed that, beginning in 2010, several Sensient workers (some of whom had begun working for the company in 2008) took extended leaves of absence for disability-related care, including surgeries and cancer treatments. The EEOC asserted that these employees were either discharged for surpassing the company’s restrictive leave policy, or were required to return to work without accommodations or restrictions. It further asserted that when employees attempted to return to work, even without restrictions, Sensient refused to accept them back and fired them instead. The EEOC claimed that, as a result of its practices, Sensient pushed out disabled individuals, including many long-term employees, due to the individuals’ use of leave as an accommodation and/or because of their actual or perceived disabilities. Defense counsel denied the EEOC’s allegations and maintained that Sensient fully complied with the ADA, including the ADA’s obligation to provide reasonable accommodations to qualified individuals with disabilities. Counsel argued that Sensient provided extended leave to the claimants well in excess of legal requirements, including the FMLA. Counsel further contended that Sensient terminated the claimants, most with eligibility for rehire, only after determining that they could not return to work or had failed to adequately justify their absences., The EEOC, on behalf of the eight claimants, sought recovery of back pay, and unspecified amounts of compensatory and punitive damages. It also sought to have Sensient institute anti-discrimination policies and provide training on employee rights under the ADA.
COURT
United States District Court, Eastern District, Fresno, CA
Similar Cases
Negligent tire repair caused serious rollover crash: family
AMOUNT:
$375,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Steep, winding road caused multiple truck crashes: plaintiffs
AMOUNT:
$32,500,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Dangerous highway caused fatal multiple vehicle crash: suit
AMOUNT:
$18,681,052
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Applicant claimed future care needed after fall from roof
AMOUNT:
$3,500,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Roofer claimed he needs future care after fall from roof
AMOUNT:
$6,000,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
INJURIES:
- anxiety
- brain
- brain damage
- brain injury
- cognition
- depression
- epidural
- extradural hematoma
- face
- facial bone
- fracture
- head
- headaches
- hearing
- impairment
- insomnia
- loss of
- mental
- nose
- psychological
- scapula
- sensory
- shoulder
- skull
- speech
- subdural hematoma
- tinnitus
- traumatic brain injury
- vision
- Show More
- Show Less
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Plaintiff: Improperly trained delivery personnel caused injuries
AMOUNT:
$4,875,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury