Case details
Firefighters claimed city undercalculated overtime pay
SUMMARY
$2700000
Amount
Settlement
Result type
Not present
Ruling
KEYWORDS
FACTS
Between May 2014 and August 2018, plaintiffs Christopher Gaffney, Andre Jerome Soto, John O’Leary, Guido Quartaroli and Jeff Provancher, firefighters for the city of Santa Clara, were allegedly not paid the correct overtime rate. Gaffney, Soto, O’Leary, Quartaroli and Provancher, representing a class of similarly-situated firefighter employees, sued the city of Santa Clara. They alleged that the city’s actions constituted violations of the Fair Labor Standards Act. Plaintiffs’ counsel contended that the city failed to include the value of unused medical benefits and specialty pay, such as hazardous duty, in calculating overtime pay. Counsel asserted that the “regular rate of pay” used in overtime pay calculation included all compensation with certain exceptions, such as gifts, and that the 2016 case of Flores v. City of San Gabriel established that medical benefits are part of the “regular rate of pay,” and must be included in calculating overtime. Plaintiffs’ counsel also contended that the city failed to update its payroll system at that time and did not do so until 2018. Defense counsel initially denied the plaintiffs’ allegations, and claimed the class was exempt from overtime pay., Gaffney, Soto, O’Leary, Quartaroli and Provancher, acting individually and on behalf of the class of firefighter employees, sought recovery of unpaid compensation.
COURT
United States District Court, Northern District, Santa Clara, CA
Similar Cases
Negligent tire repair caused serious rollover crash: family
AMOUNT:
$375,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Steep, winding road caused multiple truck crashes: plaintiffs
AMOUNT:
$32,500,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Dangerous highway caused fatal multiple vehicle crash: suit
AMOUNT:
$18,681,052
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Applicant claimed future care needed after fall from roof
AMOUNT:
$3,500,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Roofer claimed he needs future care after fall from roof
AMOUNT:
$6,000,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
INJURIES:
- anxiety
- brain
- brain damage
- brain injury
- cognition
- depression
- epidural
- extradural hematoma
- face
- facial bone
- fracture
- head
- headaches
- hearing
- impairment
- insomnia
- loss of
- mental
- nose
- psychological
- scapula
- sensory
- shoulder
- skull
- speech
- subdural hematoma
- tinnitus
- traumatic brain injury
- vision
- Show More
- Show Less
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Plaintiff: Improperly trained delivery personnel caused injuries
AMOUNT:
$4,875,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury