Case details
Passenger claimed crash caused need for cervical fusion
SUMMARY
$1300000
Amount
Verdict-Plaintiff
Result type
Not present
Ruling
KEYWORDS
cervical disc bulge, neck, range-of-motion problems
FACTS
On Oct. 12, 2013, plaintiff Victoria Sandoval, 54, a former field worker, was a passenger seated in a vehicle operated by plaintiff Josefina Villegas. Sandoval and Villegas were lost and trying to find a relative’s birthday party. As a result, Villegas pulled the vehicle over to the side of the road, in San Bernardino County, so that Villegas could make a phone call. However, while they were stopped, their vehicle was rear-ended by a vehicle operated by Agustin Viera, who was intoxicated. Sandoval claimed to her neck and Villegas claimed minor that had ultimately resolved. Sandoval and Villegas sued Viera, alleging that Viera was negligent in the operation of his vehicle. Villegas settled out of the case. Defense counsel conceded liability on behalf of Viera, who did not appear at trial., Sandoval claimed she sustained a cervical disc bulge at the C5-6 level, requiring fusion surgery. Two days after the incident, Sandoval presented to a hospital with complaints of neck pain, and she was subsequently treated and released. The next day, she presented to a chiropractor, in Ventura, and began treatment. However, Sandoval claimed that when chiropractic treatment failed, she was referred to the Spine & Orthopedic Center for treatment of a cervical disc bulge. She ultimately underwent a cervical fusion at the C5-6 level. Sandoval claimed that she still suffers from pain in her neck, as well as range-of-motion problems. Although she was unemployed at the time of the collision, she previously worked as a field worker. Sandoval claimed that due to her injury, she could no longer return to that profession. The plaintiff’s treating physician, an expert orthopedic surgeon, testified that Sandoval’s neck condition was related to the subject rear-end collision. After being subpoenaed by plaintiff’s counsel, the defense’s expert neurosurgeon opined that the surgery was related to the crash. Defense counsel argued that Sandoval’s alleged neck condition was unrelated to the collision. The defense’s expert orthopedic surgeon opined that Sandoval’s need for neck surgery was unrelated to the subject incident.
COURT
Superior Court of San Bernardino County, San Bernardino, CA
Similar Cases
Negligent tire repair caused serious rollover crash: family
AMOUNT:
$375,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Steep, winding road caused multiple truck crashes: plaintiffs
AMOUNT:
$32,500,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Dangerous highway caused fatal multiple vehicle crash: suit
AMOUNT:
$18,681,052
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Applicant claimed future care needed after fall from roof
AMOUNT:
$3,500,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Roofer claimed he needs future care after fall from roof
AMOUNT:
$6,000,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
INJURIES:
- anxiety
- brain
- brain damage
- brain injury
- cognition
- depression
- epidural
- extradural hematoma
- face
- facial bone
- fracture
- head
- headaches
- hearing
- impairment
- insomnia
- loss of
- mental
- nose
- psychological
- scapula
- sensory
- shoulder
- skull
- speech
- subdural hematoma
- tinnitus
- traumatic brain injury
- vision
- Show More
- Show Less
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Plaintiff: Improperly trained delivery personnel caused injuries
AMOUNT:
$4,875,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury