Case details
Plaintiff claimed employer failed to prevent sexually harassment
SUMMARY
$275000
Amount
Settlement
Result type
Not present
Ruling
KEYWORDS
emotional distress, mental, psychological
FACTS
In 2015, plaintiff Julie Valencia, an investigator for the Los Angeles County Alternate Public Defender, began working with another investigator at Alternate Public Defender locations. Valencia claimed the other investigator, who was a lesbian, made sexualized comments and remarks that made her uncomfortable. Valencia eventually reported the alleged sexual harassment to her and the other investigator’s supervisor, but Valencia claimed the supervisor failed to do anything about it. Ultimately, in 2017, Valencia left her position. Valencia sued the county of Los Angeles. She alleged that the other investigator’s actions constituted sexual harassment and that the county failed to prevent the harassment in violation of California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act. Plaintiff’s counsel contended that despite Valencia being uncomfortable with the comments, the other investigator continued to make sexualized comments and remarks, including references or comments about Valencia’s genitalia. Counsel also contended that the other investigator made insinuations or statements about wanting a sexual relationship with Valencia. Plaintiff’s counsel asserted that when Valencia complained about the other investigator’s actions, Valencia’s supervisor agreed that the comments were inappropriate, but did nothing to prevent or stop the harassment. Counsel further asserted that the supervisor failed to investigate the complaint or take any corrective action against the other investigator. Defense counsel denied that any harassment occurred, as the other investigator refuted Valencia’s claims and denied making any such comments. In addition, Valencia’s supervisor claimed that Valencia never reported any of the alleged comments to him., Valencia was an investigator with the Alternate Public Defender from March 2012 until 2017. She claimed she left her position with the Alternate Public Defender as a result of the events, but she was ultimately able to obtain new employment. Valencia also claimed that she suffered from emotional distress as a result of the events. Valencia sought recovery of damages for her emotional pain and suffering.
COURT
Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, CA
Similar Cases
Negligent tire repair caused serious rollover crash: family
AMOUNT:
$375,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Steep, winding road caused multiple truck crashes: plaintiffs
AMOUNT:
$32,500,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Dangerous highway caused fatal multiple vehicle crash: suit
AMOUNT:
$18,681,052
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Applicant claimed future care needed after fall from roof
AMOUNT:
$3,500,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Roofer claimed he needs future care after fall from roof
AMOUNT:
$6,000,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
INJURIES:
- anxiety
- brain
- brain damage
- brain injury
- cognition
- depression
- epidural
- extradural hematoma
- face
- facial bone
- fracture
- head
- headaches
- hearing
- impairment
- insomnia
- loss of
- mental
- nose
- psychological
- scapula
- sensory
- shoulder
- skull
- speech
- subdural hematoma
- tinnitus
- traumatic brain injury
- vision
- Show More
- Show Less
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Plaintiff: Improperly trained delivery personnel caused injuries
AMOUNT:
$4,875,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury