Case details
Plaintiff claimed she was fired for questioning court
SUMMARY
$313206
Amount
Verdict-Plaintiff
Result type
Not present
Ruling
KEYWORDS
emotional distress, mental, psychological
FACTS
Plaintiff Emily Gallup, a family court mediator at the Nevada County Superior Court, alleged that she was wrongfully terminated in December 2010 after she exposed the court’s failure to follow state laws. Gallup brought this qui tam action against the Superior Court of Nevada County, Carmella Smith Cellini, Sean Metroka and Thea Palmiere. She alleged that the defendants’ actions constituted wrongful termination in retaliation for whistle blowing. The individual defendants were dismissed prior to trial, and the matter proceeded against the Nevada County Superior Court only. Plaintiff claimed she was fired for continually questioning her superiors and for “challenging the system.” Defense counsel contended that Gallup was terminated because she allegedly stole confidential court documents, and disclosed them to third parties in violation of court policies and the California Code of Ethics for Court Employees of California. Counsel also contended that Gallup did not have reasonable cause to believe that the court’s family law mediation practices violated any state rules, regulations or statutes. In addition, defense counsel contended that Gallup received negative performance evaluations and reprimands for failing to perform her job functions as directed and not appropriately respecting the confidentiality of family law litigants., Gallup was employed as a family court mediator with the court since 2006. Thus, she sought recovery of damages for lost wages and emotional distress.
COURT
Superior Court of Sacramento County, Sacramento, CA
Similar Cases
Negligent tire repair caused serious rollover crash: family
AMOUNT:
$375,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Steep, winding road caused multiple truck crashes: plaintiffs
AMOUNT:
$32,500,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Dangerous highway caused fatal multiple vehicle crash: suit
AMOUNT:
$18,681,052
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Applicant claimed future care needed after fall from roof
AMOUNT:
$3,500,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Roofer claimed he needs future care after fall from roof
AMOUNT:
$6,000,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
INJURIES:
- anxiety
- brain
- brain damage
- brain injury
- cognition
- depression
- epidural
- extradural hematoma
- face
- facial bone
- fracture
- head
- headaches
- hearing
- impairment
- insomnia
- loss of
- mental
- nose
- psychological
- scapula
- sensory
- shoulder
- skull
- speech
- subdural hematoma
- tinnitus
- traumatic brain injury
- vision
- Show More
- Show Less
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Plaintiff: Improperly trained delivery personnel caused injuries
AMOUNT:
$4,875,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury