Case details
Plaintiff properly arrested after eyewitness ID: defense
SUMMARY
$0
Amount
Decision-Defendant
Result type
Not present
Ruling
KEYWORDS
carpal tunnel syndrome, wrist, wrists
FACTS
On Jan. 5, 2011, plaintiff Kamran Vala was walking on a sidewalk in West Hollywood when he was approached by Los Angeles County Deputies. A field show-up, in which Vala was brought before an alleged witness as a suspect in a prior assault with a deadly weapon on a bus that day, resulted in the witness identifying Vala as the alleged assailant. Vala was subsequently arrested, and he claimed his wrists were injured during the time he was handcuffed. Vala sued the Deputies Alkalamy, Trujillo, Jesus Perez and Michael Fairbanks; and their employers, the county of Los Angeles and the Los Angeles County Sheriff’s Department. Vala alleged that the deputies’ actions constituted false arrest and excessive force and that the county and sheriff’s department were vicariously liable for the deputies’ actions. Several of the defendants were let out of the case on various summary judgments, and a jury trial was waived. Thus, the matter proceeded to a bench trial against Fairbanks only. Fairbanks claimed that Vala was a malingerer, in that Vala was stopped and arrested based on the eyewitness identification and that there was reasonable force used during his apprehension., Vala claimed both wrists were severely injured during the improper handcuffing. He alleged that as a result, he suffered carpal tunnel syndrome, requiring a carpal tunnel release procedure. Vala’s wife, Patty Mena, initially sought loss-of-consortium damages, but her claim settled prior to trial.
COURT
Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Los Angeles, CA
Similar Cases
Negligent tire repair caused serious rollover crash: family
AMOUNT:
$375,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Steep, winding road caused multiple truck crashes: plaintiffs
AMOUNT:
$32,500,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Dangerous highway caused fatal multiple vehicle crash: suit
AMOUNT:
$18,681,052
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Applicant claimed future care needed after fall from roof
AMOUNT:
$3,500,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Roofer claimed he needs future care after fall from roof
AMOUNT:
$6,000,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
INJURIES:
- anxiety
- brain
- brain damage
- brain injury
- cognition
- depression
- epidural
- extradural hematoma
- face
- facial bone
- fracture
- head
- headaches
- hearing
- impairment
- insomnia
- loss of
- mental
- nose
- psychological
- scapula
- sensory
- shoulder
- skull
- speech
- subdural hematoma
- tinnitus
- traumatic brain injury
- vision
- Show More
- Show Less
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Plaintiff: Improperly trained delivery personnel caused injuries
AMOUNT:
$4,875,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury