Case details
Restaurants’ female workers claimed they were harassed by men
SUMMARY
$1250000
Amount
Settlement
Result type
Not present
Ruling
KEYWORDS
FACTS
In 2014, intervening plaintiff Katelyn Mejia and several other young female workers at various Del Taco restaurants, many of whom were under the age of 18, claimed that they were being sexually harassed by at least three male employees, some of whom were in supervisory positions. The women claimed that Del Taco’s management and human-resources department failed to adequately respond to their complaints and that, instead, they were retaliated against for making formal complaints. Some of the female employees resigned as a result of the events. The U.S. Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, acting in the claimants’ behalf, sued the restaurants’ operator, Del Taco, LLC. The lawsuit alleged that the actions of Del Taco’s male employees constituted sexual harassment and retaliation, in violation of Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964. The lawsuit also alleged that Del Taco failed to prevent the sexual harassment and retaliation, and caused the constructive discharge of several of the female claimants. Plaintiffs’ counsel claimed that the male employees of Del Taco harassed the female workers with inappropriate sexual comments and unwanted physical touching. Plaintiffs’ counsel also claimed that although some of the young females made formal complaints to management, human resources and the EEOC, no corrective action was taken and that, instead, the male employees retaliated by changing the schedules and reducing the working hours of the females who complained. Del Taco contended that it investigated the claims from the female workers., The EEOC sought recovery of damages for the claimants’ past emotional distress. It also sought injunctive relief and punitive damages.
COURT
United States District Court, Central District, Los Angeles, CA
Similar Cases
Negligent tire repair caused serious rollover crash: family
AMOUNT:
$375,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Steep, winding road caused multiple truck crashes: plaintiffs
AMOUNT:
$32,500,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Dangerous highway caused fatal multiple vehicle crash: suit
AMOUNT:
$18,681,052
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Applicant claimed future care needed after fall from roof
AMOUNT:
$3,500,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Roofer claimed he needs future care after fall from roof
AMOUNT:
$6,000,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
INJURIES:
- anxiety
- brain
- brain damage
- brain injury
- cognition
- depression
- epidural
- extradural hematoma
- face
- facial bone
- fracture
- head
- headaches
- hearing
- impairment
- insomnia
- loss of
- mental
- nose
- psychological
- scapula
- sensory
- shoulder
- skull
- speech
- subdural hematoma
- tinnitus
- traumatic brain injury
- vision
- Show More
- Show Less
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Plaintiff: Improperly trained delivery personnel caused injuries
AMOUNT:
$4,875,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury