Case details
Scaffold fall caused need for ongoing care: construction worker
SUMMARY
$3432805
Amount
Settlement
Result type
Not present
Ruling
KEYWORDS
brain, brain injury, bruise, chest, closed head, face, facial, fracture, head, mental, neurological, neurological impairment, neuropsychological, nose, psychological, traumatic brain injury
FACTS
On Aug. 25, 2011, applicant Oscar Garcia, 38, a construction worker, was working on a scaffold in Redding when he fell approximately 20 to 25 feet to the ground below. He suffered to his head, face, back, and an arm. Garcia filed a workers’ compensation claim against his employer, Certified Coating, and the workers’ compensation carrier, American International Group Inc. (AIG). Garcia brought claims against the companies in an attempt to collect workers’ compensation benefits., Garcia claimed that he sustained an orbital fracture, closed head , and internal brain bleeding, resulting in traumatic brain injury. He also claimed pain to his back, an arm, and chest. Garcia underwent neurological rehabilitation in Escondido in an attempt to treat his condition, but Garcia alleged his employer, Certified Coating, tried to reduce the amount of treatment needed. Garcia claimed that he now resides with his sister and her family in her home, where he receives ongoing medical care. He also claimed that he will continue to require ongoing care either at a residential care facility or with other attendant care. According to Garcia’s current counsel, Certified Coating attempted to settle with Garcia for $200,000 after Garcia’s prior counsel recommended a settlement of $250,000. However, Garcia sought a second opinion with current counsel, who began representation in 2014. Garcia’s current counsel asserted that Certified Coating and its workers compensation insurer were in denial that Garcia needed any further treatment, which was exacerbated by the undervalued settlement amount by Garcia’s prior attorney. However, Garcia’s current counsel had Garcia undergo further neuropsychological testing in an attempt further develop Garcia’s medical records and prove the industrial nature of Garcia’s brain injury. Defense counsel agreed that Garcia had sustained an orbital fracture and a bruised head, but contended that Garcia otherwise seemed fine. Thus, counsel disputed Garcia’s other alleged and denied Garcia required any further care.
COURT
Workers' Compensation Appeals Board, CA
Similar Cases
Negligent tire repair caused serious rollover crash: family
AMOUNT:
$375,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Steep, winding road caused multiple truck crashes: plaintiffs
AMOUNT:
$32,500,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Dangerous highway caused fatal multiple vehicle crash: suit
AMOUNT:
$18,681,052
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Applicant claimed future care needed after fall from roof
AMOUNT:
$3,500,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Roofer claimed he needs future care after fall from roof
AMOUNT:
$6,000,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
INJURIES:
- anxiety
- brain
- brain damage
- brain injury
- cognition
- depression
- epidural
- extradural hematoma
- face
- facial bone
- fracture
- head
- headaches
- hearing
- impairment
- insomnia
- loss of
- mental
- nose
- psychological
- scapula
- sensory
- shoulder
- skull
- speech
- subdural hematoma
- tinnitus
- traumatic brain injury
- vision
- Show More
- Show Less
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury
Plaintiff: Improperly trained delivery personnel caused injuries
AMOUNT:
$4,875,000
CASE RESULT:
Plaintiff won
CATEGORY:
Personal Injury